pingpong
Catch the risk before you commit. pingpong runs one high-stakes question through five flagship models in sequence: Grok, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, then Claude. Each step can challenge your premise or the prior answer instead of rubber-stamping it.
Built for founders, executives, consultants, investors, lawyers, product managers, and teams who do not trust a single AI answer on a decision that matters.
Plans
Your first eligible web review is free. Further web reviews need a subscription. Web Plus is $19.99/month. Web Pro is $124.99/month. On iOS the listing shows three free pingpongs, then Plus at $24.99/month or Pro at $59.99/month. Full table and checkout: pricing.
Before you commit
Most bad commits already look finished on the screen: an offer letter, a price change, a launch note, a DocuSign packet, a partnership term sheet, a raise deck, an acquisition thesis. The finger is hovering. The before you commit hub indexes short pause rituals for those irreversible moves, so you run the five-model chain once before Send, Publish, or Countersign.
- Before you hire
- Before you change pricing
- Before you launch
- Before you sign the contract
- Before you partner
- Before you raise
- Before you acquire
- Before you pivot
- Before you kill the feature
- Before you sunset
- Before you reorg
- Before you announce layoffs
- Before you enter a new market
- Before you sign the term sheet
Adversarial decision review
When the plan already has a name and you want later labs to lean on it, the adversarial decision review hub indexes pressure-test, second-guess, hole-finding, red-team, and related money pages so you pick the phrasing you already use, then run the five-model chain once.
- Pressure-test a decision
- Pressure-test your roadmap
- Red-team your decision
- Poke holes in your plan
- Devil's advocate your decision
- Pre-mortem your decision
- Steelman your decision
- Argue both sides
- Validate your decision
- Check your reasoning
- Stress-test your deck
- Stress-test your OKRs
- Second-guess your plan
- AI decision review