Give the review a decision to assess, the evidence behind it and the constraints that matter. Ask what could change the recommendation.
Define the decision
State the options, decision owner and timing. Include the source information needed to compare the options. Distinguish records you have from facts you still need.
Choose the question to test
- Which assumption, if it turns out wrong, changes the choice?
- What evidence would the other option need in order to win?
- What happens to each option if the timeline slips by a quarter?
- Who has to approve this, and what will they object to first?
Review the output
Ask for the evidence behind each objection or change. A model can raise a useful question without being right about the answer. Verify factual claims and preserve any uncertainty that remains.
Use Pingpong
The first model answers your question. Each later model receives the original question and earlier answers, with instructions to assess the work so far. You receive a final answer and can inspect the earlier passes.
Bring one concrete task from the decision guide. If you already have an answer or draft, use the second opinion guide. The models can miss errors, repeat an unsupported claim or be influenced by an earlier answer. Agreement is not proof. Check important claims against the original sources.