Pingpong is for founders-adjacent executives, GMs, and operators who make high-stakes calls: hire and fire org bets, pricing moves, partnerships, and board-ready recommendations. Paste the decision memo, org chart options, or partner term sheet. Five flagship AIs run in sequence: Grok, then Perplexity, then ChatGPT, then Gemini, then Claude. The first answers. Each later model gets your question, the prior answers, and a review frame that allows agree, correct, restructure, or reject a weak premise. You inspect the final answer and the earlier passes.
This is not a board portal. It is not a substitute for your judgment, your diligence, or the people who own the outcome. It is sequential review before you commit when a soft spot in the recommendation would land in a leadership room.
Why a single AI answer is a bad last step
ChatGPT (or Claude alone) is fine for first drafts of a leadership brief. It is weak as the last check before you hire, reprice, sign, or recommend. One model fills gaps, flatters the framing you already like, and sounds sure. Asking the same chat again keeps the same blind spots.
Leadership calls carry reputation and P&L risk. A clean narrative that hides a load-bearing assumption is how you get blindsided in the room. Sycophancy research is why "sounds board-ready" is not the same as "safe to commit."
Good questions to run
- Where does this org design leave a hole a skeptical peer or board member will attack first?
- Which premises in this hire/fire recommendation are load-bearing and unstated?
- What breaks in this pricing change if demand is wrong by half?
- What did this partnership memo leave undefended for a careful counterparty?
- Given these options, which tradeoff are we actually buying, and what would falsify it before the board sees it?
Attach the PDF memo, spreadsheet, deck, or screenshots when you can. Use Pro when the question is hard and you want extended thinking.
How the sequence helps an executive
Default order: Grok, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude. Order is configurable. Later models are allowed to reject a weak premise, not only polish wording. That is the product bet versus drafting in one chat or running models in parallel for first answers. Details: how to run a Pingpong, sequential vs parallel AI, and Pingpong vs ChatGPT.
You still decide. Pingpong is review before commit, not a guarantee and not a stand-in for executive judgment.
Plans
Free: 3 pingpongs. Plus: $24.99/mo. Pro: $59.99/mo. Full table: pricing.
Start
Try free on pingpongit.com. Ask the review question you would ask a careful operator peer, attach the draft, and read the dissent as carefully as the final answer. First-run walkthrough: how to run a Pingpong. iOS: App Store.
Also: for founders, for teams, for consultants, FAQ.